Bloomberg, April 2, 2024, Matt Levine commentary: "Shareholder Vote Exchange" [Conclusion of one experiment in commercial development of retail voting interest]

Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 
 
 
Forum distribution:
Conclusion of one experiment in commercial development of retail voting interest

 

For other recent reports of interests in retail voting rights, see

 

Source: Bloomberg, April 2, 2024, commentary 

Bloomberg


 


Opinion

Matt Levine,
Columnist

** ** **

Shareholder Vote Exchange

** ** **

April 2, 2024 at 2:19 PM EDT

By 

Matt Levine is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. A former investment banker at Goldman Sachs, he was a mergers and acquisitions lawyer at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz; a clerk for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit; and an editor of Dealbreaker.



 

* * *

Shareholder Vote Exchange

We have talked a couple of times around here about a financial novelty item called the Shareholder Vote Exchange, which was in theory a way for people to buy and sell the votes associated with their shares of publicly traded stock. If you own 1,000 shares of Walt Disney Co., you probably don’t really care about voting those shares for shareholder proposals or even contested director elections, but at Disney somebody does in fact care about getting a lot of votes. Supposedly they would pay 20 cents per vote, though I have my doubts.

The Shareholder Vote Exchange has a website, and got some media attention, because it is a fun idea. You could imagine it being a real idea: You could imagine a large active market for stock votes, separate from but related to the market for actual stock, just as there currently exists a large market for stock lending. I suppose there might be legal or other obstacles to that market really becoming big or important. But there are no such obstacled to imagining it. In a frictionless world, maybe this would be a cool thing that existed.

But in the real world SVE’s market for Disney votes — votes in a close, expensive, high-profile proxy fight in a company with a lot of retail ownership, which should be the best possible case for buying votes — seems to have been quite small and hypothetical. And on Sunday SVE emailed customers to say that it was winding down operations. “There's clearly a market opportunity here, but we weren't in a strong position to achieve its full potential,” its CEO told me. Ah well.

* * *



This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story:
Matt Levine at 
mlevine51@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Wendy Pollack at 
wpollack@bloomberg.net



 ©2024 Bloomberg L.P. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.