Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 
 
 

Forum distribution:

Investing based on use of capital to produce supplies for new goods or services

 

For a more broadly applicable explanation of analyzing investments based on a company's prospects for sustained returns on the use of capital, see the following article by the investment columnist whose current article is presented below:

See also the main page of the Shareholder Forum's project defining Returns on Corporate Capital for the earlier series of articles by this columnist providing a foundation for selecting investments based on a company's ability to generate sustainable profits, and for the Forum's "investor tool" that demonstrates analyses of 5,700 SEC-reporting companies with 5-year data available in 2017 when the project was concluded.

 

Source: Dow Jones MarketWatch, June 26, 2023 (updated July 1, 2023), article

 

Deep Dive

Another way to play AI stocks: These companies, including Nvidia, have been the most efficient chip makers.

Last Updated:  July 1, 2023 at 8:40 a.m. ET
First Published: June 26, 2023 at 11:19 a.m. ET

By Philip van Doorn

You can broaden your exposure to the AI and semiconductor space by adding stocks of companies with high returns on invested capital.

 

Nvidia and Intel both made a list of semiconductor manufacturers with the highest returns on invested capital.   .

MARKETWATCH/ISTOCKPHOTO

How should you play a long-term trend in the stock market? Investors have made an early bet on years of deployment of artificial intelligence across the corporate world by focusing on data-center infrastructure. This year the big bet has been on Nvidia Corp. — the stock has returned 189% this year, with dividends reinvested.

On June 15 we screened semiconductors to identify 16 industry players expected to increase sales at a compound annual growth rate of at least 15% through 2025. Nvidia NVDA ranked fourth, but it is now an expensive stock. Below is a screen of 60 makers of computer chips and related hardware showing which companies have made the most efficient use of invested capital over the past five years. This approach may be a starting point for your own research into stocks that can broaden your exposure to the AI build-out.

Too expensive?

First, let’s take a look at valuations. Here is Nvidia’s year-to-date price chart through Friday:

FACTSET

The stock popped 24% on May 25 after Nvidia projected a 50% sequential increase in sales for the current quarter, with that expectation tied to the adoption of the company’s graphics processors for AI computing in data centers.

Now let’s take a look at Nvidia’s valuations compared with those of the S&P 500 SPX, and the iShares Semiconductor ETF SOXX, which tracks the PHLX Semiconductor Index SOXX, of 30 manufacturers of computer chips or related hardware.

Here are forward price-to-earnings ratios, based on weighted rolling consensus estimates for 12 months among analysts polled by FactSet:

 

FACTSET

And now, forward price-to-sales ratios:

 

FACTSET

Some points about the valuation charts:

  • Nvidia’s forward P/E of 50.7 compares with valuations of 18.8 for the S&P 500 and 22.5 for SOXX.

  • SOXX trades at less than half of Nvidia’s P/E, even though Nvidia makes up 12.3% of the exchange-traded fund’s portfolio. That highest weighting is followed by Broadcom Inc. AVGO, at 9.3% of the portfolio and a P/E of 18.9 and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. AMD, at 7.2% of the portfolio and a P/E of 32.1.

  • Nvidia’s forward P/E of 50.7 is only 2.2 times its forward price-to-sales ratio of 22.9, emphasizing how profitable its business is expected to be. In comparison, the S&P 500’s P/E of 18.8 is more than eight times its price/sales ratio of 2.3. For SOXX, the P/E of 22.5 is 4.4 times its price/sales ratio of 5.1.

We might look back in a few years and conclude that late June of 2023 was still a good time to buy shares of Nvidia, because of its high profitability and incredible growth trend. But clairvoyance is in short supply.

SOXX can be a reasonable way to play the AI/semiconductor trend while avoiding having all your eggs in the Nvidia basket.

Or you may target AI itself, beyond chip makers, by investing in focused ETFs that take various approaches, including these three:

  • The Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF BOTZ, holds 43 stocks. It tracks an index of companies listed in developed markets. The companies are expected to benefit from the increased utilization of robotics and artificial intelligence. The fund is weighted by market capitalization; its largest holding is Nvidia, which makes up 12.4% of the portfolio, according to FactSet. It is the largest AI ETF listed here $2.4 billion in assets under management. It was established September 2016.

  • The iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF IRBO, holds 116 stocks that are equal-weighted, as it tracks a global index of companies that derive at least 50% of revenue from robotics or AI, or have significant exposure to related industries. This ETF has $408 million in assets and it was launched in June 2018.

  • The $361 million First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF ROBT, has 107 stocks in its portfolio, with a modified weighting based on how directly they are involved in AI or Robotics. It was established in February 2018.

Semiconductors — ROIC screen

Getting back to chip makers and companies that manufacture the equipment they use or provide related services, we began with the SOXX 30 and then added the 30 additional companies in the S&P 1500 Composite Index in the semiconductor industry, as determined by FactSet, or in the “Semiconductors and Semiconductor Equipment” Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) group. (The S&P 1500 Composite is made up of the S&P 500, the S&P 400 Mid Cap Index MID, and the S&P Small Cap 600 Index  SML.)

We then looked back at returns on invested capital for the companies’ past 20 reported fiscal quarters, to calculate five-year averages.

FactSet defines a company’s return on invested capital (ROIC) as earnings divided by the sum of the carrying value (not the market value) of a company’s common stock, preferred stock, long-term debt and capitalized lease obligations.

ROIC is most useful within specific industry groups for a comparison of how well management teams allocate investors’ money, because some industries naturally have higher profit margins than others. It isn’t a perfect measure and it is important to do your own research if a ROIC number makes a company appear attractive. For example, a company’s equity capital on its balance sheet may actually be negative, and this may not be a problem if it is profitable with good cash flow. But it can distort ROIC.

It turns out that among our 60 semiconductor companies, there are four for which less than 20 quarters of ROIC data are available.

Among the 56 remaining companies, there are 20 with an average ROIC of 15% (if we round up) or more over the past 20 quarters:

Company

Ticker

Avg. ROIC – past 20 quarters

Forward P/E

Forward price/ sales

Five-year total return

Market cap. ($mil)

Texas Instruments Inc.

TXN

38.47%

22.0

8.3

71%

$152,195

Lam Research Corp.

LRCX

33.29%

24.6

6.0

277%

$81,781

KLA Corp.

KLAC

31.01%

23.3

7.0

368%

$62,693

Applied Materials Inc.

AMAT

28.46%

19.6

4.8

202%

$114,264

Teradyne Inc.

TER

28.19%

29.3

5.6

178%

$16,304

Qualcomm Inc.

QCOM

26.49%

12.6

3.4

121%

$126,361

ASML Holding NV ADR

ASML

26.05%

31.6

9.4

252%

$281,346

Nvidia Corp.

NVDA

25.84%

50.7

22.9

579%

$1,042,562

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. ADR

TSM

24.64%

18.0

6.3

202%

$528,547

Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

AMD

21.99%

32.1

7.2

596%

$177,156

Skyworks Solutions Inc.

SWKS

21.60%

11.7

3.4

13%

$16,237

Monolithic Power Systems Inc.

MPWR

20.27%

40.5

12.4

281%

$23,996

Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc.

KLIC

18.86%

26.1

3.6

154%

$3,154

Power Integrations Inc.

POWI

17.87%

36.6

8.4

131%

$4,981

STMicroelectronics NV ADR

STM

17.72%

11.0

2.5

106%

$42,314

Micron Technology Inc.

MU

17.45%

N/A

3.7

16%

$71,442

Intel Corp.

INTC

16.55%

32.4

2.6

-28%

$137,643

Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Ltd.

AOSL

15.94%

22.7

1.2

97%

$822

Axcelis Technologies Inc.

ACLS

15.90%

24.8

5.3

724%

$5,511

SolarEdge Technologies Inc.

SEDG

14.77%

21.4

3.1

387%

$13,728

Source: FactSet

Click on the tickers for more about each company, ETF or index.

There is no forward P/E ratio for Micron Technology Inc. MU because the sum of analysts’ consensus earnings-per-share estimates for the company’s next four reported fiscal quarters is negative.

There is some correlation between high ROIC and total returns. Out of these 20 companies, 16 have beaten the S&P 500’s 72% total return over the past five years, with dividends reinvested. Meanwhile, 11 of them have beaten the 176% five-year return for SOXX.

It might surprise you to see Intel Corp. INTC on the list, with a 16.55% average ROIC. This is the only company that made the top 20 with a negative five-year total return. Intel is undergoing an attempted multiyear comeback, including the creation of a large chip foundry business in the U.S. and other Western countries.

Keep in mind that ROIC is a useful tool for an initial indicator of how efficient a company has been at making use of investors’ money. It is a first step that can point to companies worthy of further research as part of your effort to find companies likely to remain competitive providing goods and services over the next decade, at least.

 

About the Author

Philip van Doorn

Philip van Doorn writes the Deep Dive investing column for MarketWatch.

 

 
     Copyright ©2023 MarketWatch, Inc.

 

 

 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.