Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 
 
 

Forum distribution:

Renewed attention to a company's ability to generate sustainable profits from use of investors' capital

 

For his earlier encouragement of analyzing a company's returns on the use of its capital, see the following article by the investment columnist whose current article is presented below:

For links to five subsequent MarketWatch articles by this columnist on this subject during 2017 and 2018, and for the referenced "investor tool" that demonstrates analyses of 5,700 SEC-reporting companies with 5-year data available in 2017, see the main page of the Forum's 2017 project for defining Returns on Corporate Capital.

 

Source: Dow Jones MarketWatch, September 1, 2022 (updated Sept. 3), article

 

Deep Dive

You need quality stocks during times of turmoil. Here’s one good strategy for picking them

Last Updated: Sept. 3, 2022 at 10:23 a.m. ET
First Published: Sept. 1, 2022 at 2:23 p.m. ET

By Philip van Doorn

There is a close correlation between returns on invested capital and stock performance over long periods. Apple ranks high by both measures.

GETTY IMAGES/ISTOCKPHOTO

You may be aware of how difficult it is for fund mangers to outperform stock indexes. And now all investors face the challenge of a slowing economy as the Federal Reserve tightens monetary policy to cool the U.S. economy and clamp down on inflation.

Selecting individual companies for investment is difficult — you need to look back at performance but also look ahead, not only at estimates but to consider subjective factors. How likely is it that a company you are interested in will remain a top provider of goods and services in its industry? Could that industry, itself, be threatened over the long term?

What follows is a review of the S&P 500 SPX to focus on one metric that is closely tied to outperformance, followed by more information about a select group of companies that might help you with your own subjective analysis.

ROIC and 10-year outperformance

A company’s return on invested capital (ROIC) is defined by FactSet as earnings divided by the sum of the carrying value of a company’s common stock, preferred stock, long-term debt and capitalized lease obligations. It is an annualized figure.

ROIC sheds light on a corporate management team’s ability to make the most efficient use of the money invested to fund its business.

The carrying value of a company’s stock may be much lower than its current market capitalization. The company may have issued most of its shares many years ago at a price much lower than today’s. If a company has issued a relatively large amount of newer shares recently, or at high prices, its ROIC will be lower.

A company with a high ROIC is likely to have a relatively low amount of long-term debt on its balance sheet, or at least to have made efficient use of the borrowed money.

Some businesses are more capital intensive than others, which means ROIC comparisons might be most meaningful within specific industries. But that is not what we are doing in this screen of stocks.

For a top-down approach, there is no need to make fair comparisons. Looking back 10 years (actually the most recent 40 quarters of data available from FactSet), ROIC data is available for 453 members of the S&P 500.

Here are the 20 companies in the S&P 500 that have achieved the highest average ROIC over the past 10 years:

Company

Ticker

Industry

Average ROIC — past 40 quarters

Total return — 10 years

VeriSign Inc.

VRSN

Internet Software/ Services

270.1%

282%

HP Inc.

HPQ

Computer Processing Hardware

69.2%

398%

Domino’s Pizza Inc.

DPZ

Restaurants

64.4%

1,058%

Philip Morris International Inc.

PM

Tobacco

51.4%

75%

Accenture PLC Class A

ACN

Information Technology Services

46.3%

466%

Mastercard Inc. Class A

MA

Misc. Commercial Services

44.8%

713%

Idexx Laboratories Inc.

IDXX

Medical Specialties

42.9%

631%

AutoZone Inc.

AZO

Specialty Stores

41.3%

486%

S&P Global Inc.

SPGI

Financial Publishing/ Services

38.0%

711%

Paychex Inc.

PAYX

Data Processing Services

37.1%

410%

Cboe Global Markets Inc.

CBOE

Investment Banks/ Brokers

36.6%

394%

Yum Brands Inc.

YUM

Restaurants

35.6%

194%

Marriott International Inc. Class A

MAR

Hotels/ Resorts/ Cruiselines

34.1%

354%

Intuit Inc.

INTU

Software

33.5%

709%

Colgate-Palmolive Co.

CL

Household/ Personal Care

32.9%

85%

Ross Stores Inc.

ROST

Apparel/ Footwear Retail

32.8%

174%

Apple Inc.

AAPL

Telecommunications Equipment

32.6%

672%

Robert Half International Inc.

RHI

Personnel Services

32.0%

253%

Lockheed Martin Corp.

LMT

Aerospace & Defense

32.0%

520%

FactSet Research Systems Inc.

FDS

Data Processing Services

31.4%

425%

Source: FactSet

Click on the tickers for more about each company. Then, as part of your own analysis, read Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on MarketWatch quote pages.

Note that FactSet Research Systems Inc. FDS, which provided the data for this article, ranks 20th on the list.

The table includes 10-year total returns for the stocks, with dividends reinvested. Of the 20 companies, all but four have beaten the S&P 500’s 10-year return of 242% through Aug. 31.

Looking ahead: expected increases in sales and earnings

The lookback at ROIC for such a long period sheds light on how important it can be to remain committed for years. If we look ahead, estimates generally go out only two or three years. For this group, let’s look at estimated compound annual growth rates (CAGR) for the net two calendar years for revenue and for earnings per share. Many companies have fiscal years that don’t match the calendar, but FactSet provides calendar-year estimates.

Leaving the group in the same order, here are expected CAGR for sales and growth through 2024:

Company

Ticker

Two-year estimated sales CAGR through 2024

Two-year estimated EPS CAGR through 2024

VeriSign Inc.

VRSN

N/A

N/A

HP Inc.

HPQ

1.5%

4.6%

Domino’s Pizza Inc.

DPZ

6.8%

16.7%

Philip Morris International Inc.

PM

5.6%

7.9%

Accenture PLC Class A

ACN

9.3%

12.6%

Mastercard Inc. Class A

MA

16.0%

20.8%

Idexx Laboratories Inc.

IDXX

9.2%

18.7%

AutoZone Inc.

AZO

4.5%

9.9%

S&P Global Inc.

SPGI

8.0%

18.8%

Paychex Inc.

PAYX

6.7%

8.0%

Cboe Global Markets Inc.

CBOE

4.9%

5.1%

Yum Brands Inc.

YUM

7.4%

14.7%

Marriott International Inc. Class A

MAR

8.2%

16.9%

Intuit Inc.

INTU

14.2%

17.1%

Colgate-Palmolive Co.

CL

3.2%

8.3%

Ross Stores Inc.

ROST

6.1%

14.3%

Apple Inc.

AAPL

5.0%

7.2%

Robert Half International Inc.

RHI

3.2%

3.9%

Lockheed Martin Corp.

LMT

2.6%

15.5%

FactSet Research Systems Inc.

FDS

8.0%

10.4%

Source: FactSet

In comparison, weighted estimates call for a two-year sales CAGR of 4.5% and two-year EPS CAGR of 8.4% for the S&P 500.

For VeriSign Inc. VRSN, no estimates are available for calendar 2024. Analysts polled by FactSet expect the company’s sales in 2023 to increase by 6.4% to $1.42 billion and its earnings per share to increase by 10.9% to $6.74.

Keep in mind that a slow growth rate combined with continued high ROIC might still make for a good investment, provided a company remains a leader in its industry. This might apply to Apple Inc. AAPL.

Looking ahead: ratings and price targets

Sell-side analysts (that is, those who work for brokerage firms) tend to avoid placing negative ratings on stocks. One reason is that bad news or a long decline for a company may already be “baked into” its share price.

But it can still be worthwhile to look at consensus ratings and price targets. They are based on 12-month outlooks for companies’ financial results and for stock-price movements. Here’s a summary for the group:

Company

Ticker

Share “buy” ratings

Share neutral ratings

Share “sell” ratings

Closing price — Aug. 31

Consensus price target

Implied 12-month upside potential

VeriSign Inc.

VRSN

33%

67%

0%

$182.22

$205.00

13%

HP Inc.

HPQ

11%

67%

22%

$28.71

$31.60

10%

Domino’s Pizza Inc.

DPZ

29%

68%

3%

$371.86

$428.63

15%

Philip Morris International Inc.

PM

56%

44%

0%

$95.49

$109.57

15%

Accenture PLC Class A

ACN

65%

35%

0%

$288.46

$350.71

22%

Mastercard Inc. Class A

MA

92%

8%

0%

$324.37

$425.48

31%

Idexx Laboratories Inc.

IDXX

58%

34%

8%

$347.62

$495.88

43%

AutoZone Inc.

AZO

67%

25%

8%

$2,119.21

$2,233.79

5%

S&P Global Inc.

SPGI

90%

10%

0%

$352.18

$406.50

15%

Paychex Inc.

PAYX

15%

80%

5%

$123.34

$127.78

4%

Cboe Global Markets Inc.

CBOE

50%

36%

14%

$117.97

$136.27

16%

Yum Brands Inc.

YUM

38%

62%

0%

$111.24

$134.50

21%

Marriott International Inc. Class A

MAR

47%

53%

0%

$153.74

$170.56

11%

Intuit Inc.

INTU

87%

13%

0%

$431.78

$550.28

27%

Colgate-Palmolive Co.

CL

30%

70%

0%

$78.21

$82.67

6%

Ross Stores Inc.

ROST

54%

46%

0%

$86.27

$95.57

11%

Apple Inc.

AAPL

78%

17%

5%

$157.22

$182.87

16%

Robert Half International Inc.

RHI

29%

28%

43%

$76.97

$80.50

5%

Lockheed Martin Corp.

LMT

25%

75%

0%

$420.11

$460.39

10%

FactSet Research Systems Inc.

FDS

22%

56%

22%

$433.34

$435.91

1%

Source: FactSet

Mastercard Inc. MA is the analysts’ favorite, with 92% “buy” or equivalent ratings, followed by S&P Global Inc. SPGI at 90%, Intuit Inc. INTU at 80% and Apple at 78%.

The company with the highest number of “sell” or equivalent ratings is Robert Half International Inc. RHI, possibly reflecting a difficult environment for a staffing company at a time of such low unemployment.

In the end, you will need to do some deep thinking to form your own opinion about how well a company may continue to compete, or even if it might face an existential threat to its business over the years.

 

About the Author

Philip van Doorn

Philip van Doorn writes the Deep Dive investing column for MarketWatch.

 

Copyright ©2022 MarketWatch, Inc.

 

 

 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.