Semafor, April 29, 2025, article: "Shareholder adviser Glass Lewis joins political retreat" [Business benefits of allowing actual investors to assume responsibility for shareholder voting decisions]

Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 
 
 

Forum distribution:

Business benefits of allowing actual investors to assume responsibility for shareholder voting decisions

 

For other news and professional views addressing the interests of Forum participants in the recent development of business practices supporting control of shareholder voting decisions by individual "ultimate owners of capital," see the references listed here.

Note: It was subsequently reported by a Forum participant that after publication of the article below Glass Lewis had clarified its intention to continue its existing services of voting recommendations while developing the new research service (see April 30, 2025, The Deal: "Glass Lewis Sets the Record Straight on Custom Voting").

 

Source: Semafor, April 29, 2025, article

INTELLIGENT § TRANSPARENT § GLOBAL


Shareholder adviser Glass Lewis joins political retreat

Liz Hoffman and Rohan Goswami


Apr 29, 2025, 5:31am EDT    business

 

 

Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters

 


 

Title icon  The Scoop

For years, two firms have dominated the business of telling investors how to vote in corporate elections. One wants out.

Glass Lewis, the scrappier and smaller rival of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), is discussing a dramatic shift to essentially scrap its “house view” on ballot measures ranging from takeover battles to complaints about gender balance, political donations, and carbon emissions, according to people familiar with the matter and an internal memo seen by Semafor. The move is partly in response to heightened conservative backlash, they said.

Instead, Glass Lewis would help investors develop their own custom voting policies, handle the paperwork and regulatory reporting, and provide data and research. The changes would be phased in over a few years, and the firm would likely continue to make explicit recommendations in the meantime.

Glass Lewis has angered both corporate executives and conservative politicians by supporting, among others, ballot measures for McDonald’s to audit its racial diversity, Starbucks to produce an independent report on its labor practices, and meatpacker Tyson to disclose and defend its political contributions.

It also recommended that shareholders reject Jamie Dimon’s $53 million bonus in 2022, which earned it the unending ire, recently vented in an interview with Semafor, of the JPMorgan chief. (In a perfectly timed juxtaposition, ISS on Monday recommended that BlackRock shareholders vote down CEO Larry Fink’s $30 million-plus pay package.)

Its pivot reflects a growing desire among players across the financial industry to get out of the moralizing business and back into the business of managing and making money. The most visible backpedaling happened at investment giant BlackRock, which has retreated from its late 2010s progressive push under a hail of political arrows.

“Speak softly and invest money,” Mark Wiedman, then a top BlackRock’s executive told Semafor in 2023, about a year into the $11.6 trillion firm’s change of heart. BlackRock and Vanguard have both dialed back their requirements that public company boards include women and minority investors, and rolled out new options for investors to vote their own shares, rather than adopt BlackRock’s house view.

Other gatekeepers, like Goldman Sachs, a major IPO underwriter, and Nasdaq have scrapped similar requirements — the latter after a court order.

Glass Lewis’ own pivot comes a year into the tenure of its new CEO, Bob Mann, and amid an investigation by House Republicans into it and ISS. The two firms control an estimated 90% of the US shareholder-advice market, which critics say has allowed them to push an ideological agenda. Glass Lewis’ moves would go beyond those of ISS, which said in February that it would no longer consider the diversity of board members when making its recommendations.

congressional hearing is set for Tuesday afternoon.

Title icon  Liz’s view

I’ve always found Republican claims of a vast left-wing conspiracy in investing a little silly. BlackRock, Glass Lewis, Goldman Sachs, and Nasdaq are commercial creatures, and they were responding to commercial pressures in the late 2010s and early 2020s.

The political winds were blowing left, so they went left. BlackRock was cajoled into joining a climate-change coalition by European and Japanese pension funds that threatened to pull their money if it didn’t. Not to say that Larry Fink didn’t believe in diversity, or see a chance to burnish his own standing by fronting a social movement. But as I wrote last summer, his leftward shift seemed “like a CEO tweaking his company’s product because some important customers stopped buying it.”

Now the customers want something else. Plus, designing and executing custom voting policies for clients is more profitable for Glass Lewis than having big ideas of its own, according to people familiar with the privately held company’s finances. Making more money while getting yelled at less is a good business model.

Title icon  Rohan’s view

ESG handwringing aside, this will shake up the world of activist investing, where dissident hedge funds and companies lobby Glass Lewis hard to recommend their case to shareholders. Many institutional investors automatically vote their shares however their chosen proxy firm recommends, and every public missive and presentation from both sides is aimed at swaying the proxy advisors’ internal judges.

At one of the few active proxy fights of this season – a battle between activist Elliott Management and Phillips 66 – Elliott spent the day in Washington on Monday speaking with ISS, according to people familiar with the matter. Phillips is scheduled to meet with them Tuesday, according to other people with knowledge of the event.

Glass Lewis’ decision changes the game for these investors. Where there was once a duopoly, now ISS will have singular sway over huge swathes of the shareholder base. ISS may be willing to bear the political heat that comes with it.

Title icon  Room for Disagreement

Deeply researched recommendations from proxy advisory firms are “essential,” Better Markets, the left-leaning Wall Street advocacy group, wrote this week. “Without these firms, investors would receive only management’s perspective on the key issues a company faces, and all too often management’s perspective favors management over the long-term interests of the company and its shareholders.”



© 2025 SEMAFOR INC.

 

 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program using the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.