Forum Home Page [see Broadridge note below]

 The Shareholder ForumTM`

Fair Investor Access

This public program was initiated in collaboration with The Conference Board Task Force on Corporate/Investor Engagement and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies. The Forum is providing continuing reports of the issues that concern this program's participants, as summarized  in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

"Fair Access" Home Page

"Fair Access" Program Reference

 

Related Projects 2012-2019

For graphed analyses of company and related industry returns, see

Returns on Corporate Capital

See also analyses of

Shareholder Support Rankings

 
 
 

Forum distribution:

Activist slide show generates mixed reviews

 

For the Barington announcement and slide presentation referenced in the article below, see

 

Source: Bloomberg Businessweek, December 17, 2013 article

Bloomberg.com

Bloomberg Businessweek

Companies & Industries

 

 

Menu Revamp
Olive Garden's Parent Needs a Fix, but Would a Company Split Help?


Darden Restaurants (DRI) has long frustrated investors. Its flagship brand, Olive Garden, has seen traffic dip as all-you-can-eat salad and breadsticks no longer entice budget diners as they once did, and widespread discounting has pummeled profits. Even worse for Darden management, those discounts have largely failed to boost sales.

Is there a fix? Barington Capital Group, a hedge fund that owns about 2.8 percent of Darden’s shares, is pushing for a split of the company into three units: the mature chains, Red Lobster and Olive Garden; a growth unit that consists of the LongHorn Steakhouse, Bahama Breeze, Yard House, Capital Grille, Seasons 52, and Eddie V’s brands; and a publicly traded investment trust with Darden’s extensive real estate holdings. The Orlando-based company owns more real estate than most of its restaurant competitors; Barington estimates that Darden’s land and property holdings are worth more than $4 billion.

Barington argues that Darden’s portfolio has become too complex to compete in the industry, as it added five of its eight restaurant brands since 2007. “As a result of these acquisitions, Darden has become a complex business, managing eight restaurant brands that target different customer segments, have different marketing needs, serve vastly different menus with different price points and require different culinary and customer experience innovations,” Barington said in a presentation (PDF) it released today, ahead of the company’s Dec. 19 quarterly earnings call.

In an e-mailed statement, Darden said its board “will take the time necessary to thoroughly evaluate Barington’s suggestions, just as the company does for any of its shareholders.” Olive Garden and Red Lobster accounted for almost three-quarters of the company’s $8.7 billion in revenue over the past year. The company has more than 2,100 restaurants total.

Barington contends that its plan would send Darden shares as high as $80. At its current price of around $52, the stock has gained 16 percent this year—including 13 percent since Barington revealed its breakup plans in October—trailing rivals such as Brinker International (EAT) (47 percent), Cheesecake Factory (CAKE) (46 percent), Del Frisco’s Restaurant Group (DFRG) (35 percent), and DineEquity (DIN) (24 percent), the parent of the Applebee’s and IHOP chains.

Wall Street analysts aren’t persuaded, for the most part, that splitting Darden would help all that much. Analysts have generally been more keen on a broad $50 million cost-cutting plan the chain introduced this fall. Darden spends significantly more than rivals on advertising, primarily for its two flagship chains, and it’s far from clear that those ubiquitous TV ads are helping the company much. For Darden, the “biggest value enhancer” would be a turnaround at Olive Garden, Oppenheimer analyst Brian Bittner wrote in a client note today, although he’s not optimistic that will begin in the current quarter. In October, Telsey Advisory Group analyst Peter Saleh predicted that Darden directors would not split the company but begin focusing on free cash flow and less on expansion.

Barington said its recommendations had been subject to an independent review by Houlihan Lokey, an investment bank the hedge fund hired to assess the plan. “Their work not only confirms the opportunities we identified to improve long-term shareholder value at Darden, it also adds practical strategies to execute our recommendations and mitigate implementation costs,” Barington’s founder and chief executive, James Mitarotonda, said in a statement.

Bachman is an associate editor for Businessweek.com.

©2013 Bloomberg L.P. All Rights Reserved. Made in NYC

 

 

This Forum program was open, free of charge, to anyone concerned with investor interests in the development of marketplace standards for expanded access to information for securities valuation and shareholder voting decisions. As stated in the posted Conditions of Participation, the purpose of this public Forum's program was to provide decision-makers with access to information and a free exchange of views on the issues presented in the program's Forum Summary. Each participant was expected to make independent use of information obtained through the Forum, subject to the privacy rights of other participants.  It is a Forum rule that participants will not be identified or quoted without their explicit permission.

This Forum program was initiated in 2012 in collaboration with The Conference Board and with Thomson Reuters support of communication technologies to address issues and objectives defined by participants in the 2010 "E-Meetings" program relevant to broad public interests in marketplace practices. The website is being maintained to provide continuing reports of the issues addressed in the program, as summarized in the January 5, 2015 Forum Report of Conclusions.

Inquiries about this Forum program and requests to be included in its distribution list may be addressed to access@shareholderforum.com.

The information provided to Forum participants is intended for their private reference, and permission has not been granted for the republishing of any copyrighted material. The material presented on this web site is the responsibility of Gary Lutin, as chairman of the Shareholder Forum.

Shareholder Forum™ is a trademark owned by The Shareholder Forum, Inc., for the programs conducted since 1999 to support investor access to decision-making information. It should be noted that we have no responsibility for the services that Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., introduced for review in the Forum's 2010 "E-Meetings" program and has since been offering with the “Shareholder Forum” name, and we have asked Broadridge to use a different name that does not suggest our support or endorsement.